Healthcare & Life Sciences
70,000 Claims a Month, By Hand
Medical Device Manufacturer

Summary
Seventy thousand claims arrived each month typed, handwritten, and misaligned. Variation broke every rules-based approach. Generative AI paired with human review created a path through that complexity without trading compliance for speed.
Moment
Around 70,000 claims per month were processed manually. Forms arrived typed, handwritten, and misaligned, and variation broke traditional automation.
Tension
Stay manual to protect compliance, or test generative AI in a disciplined, auditable way.
Risk
Over-automation could raise error rates and regulatory exposure. Moving too cautiously would lock in cycle time and cost.
Execution
We paired AI extraction with human review and confidence thresholds. Automation handled high-confidence cases and routed edge cases to reviewers with clear audit trails. Implementation stayed forward-deployed—inside regulated operations, with human review and control boundaries defined before scale.
Outcome
~70,000 claims/month processed; manual effort reduction path with explicit AI boundaries
Continuity
What had to stay stable during the change
Compliance audit trails and human review for edge cases had to remain intact during automation rollout.
More like this
Have a similar engagement in front of you?
Describe the situation. We'll say quickly if we're the right fit.
Talk through the situation

